|
|
Even though Ive been playing Warhammer 5th
Edition since it was released in 1996, and even though I possess three Warhammer armies
and play in Grand Tournaments, Ive always thought that 5th edition
Warhammer was a seriously flawed game. Im hardly alone in this
estimationalmost everyone who plays the game has a gripe with it. Though the game
had a lot to recommend itincluding excellent core mechanics, beautiful miniature
figures, a deep and detailed fantasy world and pretty good support from Games
Workshopthe rules themselves had some serious shortcomings. First and foremost, the
Warhammer 5th edition rules were unclear and ambiguous, so much so that
theres a fan-generated 90-page FAQ on the rules that every hardcore gamer considers
essential. Some of the more incomprehensible rules never quite got figured outfor
example, the skirmish rules are so poorly written that Ive never seen any two gaming
groups play them the same. Not only were the rules terribly written, the entire game
system was so loosely balanced that Warhammer games tended to devolve into
Herohammersince there were very few restrictions to army composition, it
wasnt at all unusual to face armies made up of a few uberpowerful magic-drenched
heroes and a couple of elite units led by champions with king-hell weapons and armor. And
dont even get me started on the over-the-top magic items and spells available to
troopstheres nothing like facing a 30-model army decked out with the Forbidden
Rod and Curse of Years. I know that some like playing this wayin my experience, most
13-year-olds and almost everyone from California. But this tended to force a certain style
of play that placed a premium on nasty magic items and powerful troops (in Warhammer
parlance, cheese) at the expense of well-balanced and characterful
armies. This got so out of hand, in fact, that it wasnt long before White Dwarf (the
official Games Workshop magazine) began suggesting restrictions on magic items and troop
types, and enforcing such restrictions at Grand Tournaments. Adding to this imbalance, a
whole new host of army books were released for the various Warhammer races. Starting with
the Brettonians and the Lizardmen, the army books offered increasingly powerful armies and
unit types. So powerful, in fact, that the armies that did not get new
booksespecially Empire and Dwarfswere uncompetitive, and rarely seen on
tabletops or in tournaments.
We need not have fretted. Warhammer
Fantasy Battles 6th edition is a resounding success. Though the game retains
its core mechanics, the rules are much clearer and tighter, with copious illustrations of
game situations and very helpful appendices, a trend I attribute to the influence of the
stern Finn engineer and co-author Tuomas Pirinen over the loosey-goosey lets
have a pint GW Brits. And yes, the emphasis is on tactics and balanced armies, and
away from superheroes and elite units. As in 40K, youll be limited to the number of
elite units you can select for your army, and core units are now required. Stat lines for
units and characters have been toned down, as welldont expect invulnerable
generals anymore. Besides this shift in philosophy, the biggest change is the magic
system, which has been simplified (thank God!) and made less dominating.
Throughout the rules, youll
notice subtle changes intended to deemphasize the role of superhero generals and highlight
the importance of core troopsfor example, generals have much less powerful stat
lines, magic items are more restricted and less powerful, and your units dont have
to take panic tests if your general dies--to me, this is the most significant of the
changes. In 5th edition, you had to buff up your general to ungodly
standardsif you didnt, you could be sure hed die a quick death, and your
army, bereft of his leadership, would usually fail its panic tests and flee the board. In
sixth edition, losing ones general is still a significant blow, but its not a
gamebreaker. In 6th edition, your
troops will win the battle for you, not your general. Its interesting that the most
powerful weapon in the just-released Empire army book is the Imperial doctrine of using
detachments. This focus on battlefield tactics is most welcome, and seems to presage an
attempt to differentiate tactical doctrines from army to army, giving each a distinct
feel that goes further than troop types. While they remain mostly intact,
there has been some fine-tuning of the core rules, and Ill try to cover the
most significant changes here. The most
noticeable change in the game turn is that the magic phase (more about this later) no
longer comes last, but rather between the movement and shooting phases. Other than that,
the game turn sequence looks much the same, as do the movement and shooting phases,
although there seems to be a concerted effort in these rules to eliminate the pernicious
practice of clipping.
Psychology has been fiddled with a
bit as well. Some troops are now stubborn, which means they ignore any
modifiers in break tests. The major change, however, has been in frenzy, which now adds
only +1 attack, rather than doubling attacks. Anyone who has ever faced a Khorne army may
now smile. Another change for the better is the elimination of flying high,
which probably caused more arguments than any other rule in the game. Now fliers can move
20. Thats enough. Let me tell you how much I love these
rule changes. In my first tournament game last year, I faced a Khorne demon army. First
turn, my opponent faces his Khorne demon away from my army and flies high. Second turn, he
lands his demon on top of my modestly-kitted general, attacks with a frenzy-induced
million or so attacks, and slaughters him. After panic tests for my dead general,
Ive got three units left on the board. Game over. Now all of this was well within
the rules, and I dont begrudge my opponent (who was a really nice guy) his victory.
But it wasnt much fun. And you know what? In the new rules, this could not happen.
No flying high, no overpowered demon with massive frenzy attacks, no panic test for
generals death. This leaves me free to actually fight a battle. And
thats the major difference between the 5th and 6th editions.
As you know by now, Im all in
favor of these changes. Warhammer Fantasy Battles, sixth edition, is the best and cleanest
set of rules Games Workshop has ever produced, and continues the welcome trend towards
clarity and comprehensiveness begun in Mordheim and Warmaster. The new Warhammer is an
explicit move away from gamesmanship and cheese and towards generalship and tactical
savvy. While I could pick a few nits with the some aspects of the rule
booktheres not nearly enough background fluff on the various armies, and the
lack of the Ravening Hordes army lists is inexcusabletheres nothing about the
rules I dont like. Well be reviewing all the new Warhammer army books, and
keeping an eye on how the edition develops, but for now, Sigmar be thanked, things are
looking very promising in the Warhammer world.
|