Oh
crap! "Active members of a subversive group have acquired several
captured Luftwaffe aircraft, brought back by the Allies from the German
front! They are threatening to destroy the tourist site at the Grand
Canyon." What are you going to do in this, Americas most dire
hour? Well, you could easily shoot them down with a USAAF Spitfire Mk V,
but that wouldnt even start to explore the possibilities at your
disposal. What Im talking about here is the chance to do some real
damage in a Cessna 206 Stationair--thats right.
First in
Belgium-based Wilco Publishings planned series of "Reality
Flights," Reality Flights: Grand Canyon is an add-on for Microsoft
Flight Simulator and Combat Flight Simulator. The forgoing scenario,
believe it or not, is featured in CFS thanks to this add-on. I know what
you're thinking, "Reality Flights?" However, theres a lot
more to Grand Canyon than bizarre combat scenarios, which it is capable of
supplying in abundance. It features a huge amount of new terrain, several
small and medium-sized airports, and a handful of new aircraft, if you're
getting tired of what is currently available. It also provides a few
planned VFR flights--for those into realistic civilian flying--that do not
disappoint. A combined Las Vegas/Phoenix sectional aeronautical chart is
included with the add-on.
The scenery is
not much of an improvement on FS or CFS. The press release boasts a
"combination of authentic aerial photographs, precise topographical
data, and state-of-the-art 3D modeled digitized scenery." What that
often translates into is, unfortunately, some kind of calico cut and paste
job. In much of the add-on it looks like Wilco took bits and pieces of
other Microsoft Flight Sim-related scenery and threw it all together
without bothering to match or blend the edges. In some places the textures
are so disparate that it messes with your perspective. Given that there
are over12,000 square miles of flyable terrain, from Las Vegas to Lake
Mead, from Hoover Dam up the Colorado River, you can usually move on and
ignore the bad bits. There are also eight airports for you to visit,
practice a few touch-and-gos, or bomb if you feel like it. Oh, that
reminds me, Ive been meaning to bomb the Hoover Dam, but Im still
too preoccupied with that butt-kicking 206.
Speaking of
planes, with Grand Canyon you get the aforementioned Cessna 206 Stationair,
the De Havilland Twin Otter Vistaliner, Bell 430 chopper, and USAAF
Spitfire Mk V. The latter looks to be merely a new exterior skin on an
existing CFS model. Though the cockpit art has been swapped for a more
rustic look, thats not to say I dont like it, I actually almost
prefer it now to the CFS original. The Twin Otter was also a welcome
surprise, this workhorse flies like a barge, but Ive go a soft-spot for
STOL aircraft, especially big ones. As for the Bell 430, it flies like a
chopper should--barely. It took me a while to beat the air into submission
with this one. I managed to eke the most fun out of Grand Canyon by
attempting to shoot down F109's with the 206, and oddly enough I was
fairly successful--just watch the stall in those turns. That brings up
another little beef, the 206 seemed quite squirrely for an airplane with a
reputation for flying like a truck. The exterior views of all of the
planes looked great, and there are plenty of opportunities for some nice
screenshots.
At the suggested
price of $34.95, Reality Flights: Grand Canyon gives the MFS and CFS
player a respectable amount of new replay value for their original games.
It was easy to install within the parent products, worked within them
well, and presented rather unique opportunities. What you dont get,
though, is the impeccably polished quality of the original products as
they came from Microsoft. The quality of the graphics are just not quite
up to par with what is available elsewhere, and it is unfortunate that the
spectacular Grand Canyon doesnt come across as very spectacular. If you
can get around these problems, and have the cash burning a hole in your
pocket, then you could do worse than Reality Flights.
--Thomas Hoff